Hard Edge - Review Cover

Hard Edge

(2003)
Buy it here:
Director: Andrew Blake
Posted: July 28, 2003
Run time: 116 Min (1 hr 56 min)
Reviewer: Terry (PL)
Reaction: Very Good
Please consider supporting the site by clicking our partner banners.
If you don't see them, you may have an ad-blocker
Summary:
      This one gets a 8.5
Details:
      This isn't your typical movie, so I don't plan on reviewing this one as such either. I'm just going to basically do my thoughts here and give the rating below. Starting with the negative things, I wasn't too fond of some of the camera work or imagery we get and the occasional blurring effect we got was a little annoying. Other than that this was an extremely erotic and sexy movie. As with all Andrew Blake movies we have nothing but beautiful sexy women in the scene with a range of skin tones and looks. They cover things such as smoking and foot fetish stuff, as well as covering the girl/girl and girl/girl/girl aspect too. It's been a while since I have seen an AB movie but this is the first one I can remember seeing boy/girl action, and twice at that. As I stated earlier there was some imagery I didn't care for but then again there was A LOT and I mean A LOT of imagery I did like. I personally think the scenes with Adriana Sage looked the best just because her skin tone looks so damn good against the other girls. In no particular order I have provided a few screenshot of the movie, some of my more favorite ones anyway. But wrapping things up, if you like erotic or Andrew Blake, your sure to like this movie. Also those who like lesbian action, this should appeal greatly to you since MOST of the action is solo or 2 or 3 girl action.

P.S. This one is included just due to how odd it looked....

Opening scene with the glass table with the girl underneath licking the table.
Wine girl
A true "shoe horn"
Our picturesque beauty, Adriana
Champagne bath
A girl after my own heart; with a target
Please consider supporting the site by clicking our partner banners.
If you don't see them, you may have an ad-blocker