GirlsOutWest.com
Buy it here:
Summary:
I'll admit the site reminds me a lot of Yanks.com from a content perspective, but certainly had more diversity in the type of scenes that were offered up
(Solo, Girl/Girl and Boy/Girl). The site also reminded me a little of my OLD site.
The videos had a look and feel of a woman's touch all over them, and I think that's exactly what made me enjoy the site so much. The curators of the site get it right with the amateur girls
they offer up with the feel of the videos and are exactly what I like to see. I truly enjoy seeing all types of girls and this site delivered that in spades. I couldn't recommend this site
enough, but it's not for those who are looking for a more produced feel, or those looking for the "pornstar types". Excellent site!
Details:
When I was reviewing Yanks.com I seen an advertisement for GirlsOutWest.com. Looking like a site I would be interested in, based on
Yanks.com, I contacted them about a review. And I'm very happy I did, and that they agreed.
Inside the site, they are very proud of how long they have been around (over 14 years) and have amassed 887 models, over 319,000 photos and almost 3200 videos. The videos are the heart and soul of the site, of course, and can be filtered by type (Solo, Girl/Girl and Boy/Girl), most recent, most popular and by name. They all worked expected except for the name one. I couldn't quite figure out how "Teenage Lust" came before "A Dream Come True". Not really a big issue though since I tend to look through the updates in latest first. The photos area was pretty much like the videos section, even having the same sorting issue on the name/title, however the models section worked as expected.
Some of the videos were served up in parts, some as many as 5, 6 or even 7, but most were single videos with some of them having multiple participants. The site focused on solo and girl/girl scenes, but there were some boy/girl stuff, and some good boy/girl action to boot! But that's not to insinuate that the solo and girl/girl action was mediocre or less good; quite the contrary. I just so happen to like the type of "feel" the videos had and adding boys to the mix was a great idea. It also made them more special since their numbers were much smaller than the others in comparison.
Each video was downloadable (1080 "True HD", 720 "HD", 576 "High", 288 "Low"), as well as streamable in the same qualities. Moreover, each scene predominantly display its user rating, the ability to favorite it and a section for user comments. I didn't see a lot of comments, surprisingly, but when I did they were what I were expecting; positive. Something I did notice, and didn't like, was the fact if there was any picture sets for the scene, they weren't linked in any way to the video. Additionally, if you listed a particular model's videos, the videos vs the picture sets weren't clearly labeled, and you couldn't just filter them to be one or the other.
Likes:
Owned and shoot by women; and a topper is the girls shooting the scenes get naked during them!
Very natural girls (they aren't made up like "pornstars" and some are hairy - all good by me!)
Post scene BTS (more or less) - allowing the girls personalities to shine
Lots of high definition videos.
Daily updates
Boy/Girl content which seemed pretty authentic (possibly real couples)
The look of the site
Can comment and rate videos.
Dislikes:
Dated look and feel in the members area.
Although boasting lots of pictures, they didn't get tied to videos very well
Short videos.
Improperly tagged videos.
Inside the site, they are very proud of how long they have been around (over 14 years) and have amassed 887 models, over 319,000 photos and almost 3200 videos. The videos are the heart and soul of the site, of course, and can be filtered by type (Solo, Girl/Girl and Boy/Girl), most recent, most popular and by name. They all worked expected except for the name one. I couldn't quite figure out how "Teenage Lust" came before "A Dream Come True". Not really a big issue though since I tend to look through the updates in latest first. The photos area was pretty much like the videos section, even having the same sorting issue on the name/title, however the models section worked as expected.
Some of the videos were served up in parts, some as many as 5, 6 or even 7, but most were single videos with some of them having multiple participants. The site focused on solo and girl/girl scenes, but there were some boy/girl stuff, and some good boy/girl action to boot! But that's not to insinuate that the solo and girl/girl action was mediocre or less good; quite the contrary. I just so happen to like the type of "feel" the videos had and adding boys to the mix was a great idea. It also made them more special since their numbers were much smaller than the others in comparison.
Each video was downloadable (1080 "True HD", 720 "HD", 576 "High", 288 "Low"), as well as streamable in the same qualities. Moreover, each scene predominantly display its user rating, the ability to favorite it and a section for user comments. I didn't see a lot of comments, surprisingly, but when I did they were what I were expecting; positive. Something I did notice, and didn't like, was the fact if there was any picture sets for the scene, they weren't linked in any way to the video. Additionally, if you listed a particular model's videos, the videos vs the picture sets weren't clearly labeled, and you couldn't just filter them to be one or the other.
Likes:
Owned and shoot by women; and a topper is the girls shooting the scenes get naked during them!
Very natural girls (they aren't made up like "pornstars" and some are hairy - all good by me!)
Post scene BTS (more or less) - allowing the girls personalities to shine
Lots of high definition videos.
Daily updates
Boy/Girl content which seemed pretty authentic (possibly real couples)
The look of the site
Can comment and rate videos.
Dislikes:
Dated look and feel in the members area.
Although boasting lots of pictures, they didn't get tied to videos very well
Short videos.
Improperly tagged videos.
Please consider supporting the site by clicking our partner banners.
If you don't see them, you may have an ad-blocker
