Please consider supporting the site by clicking our partner banners.
If you don't see them, you may have an ad-blocker
WetAndPuffy.com
Buy it here:
Please consider supporting the site by clicking our partner banners.
If you don't see them, you may have an ad-blocker
Summary:
This one gets a 7.50. While I enjoyed the site, I got kind of bored. There were only 3 classifications of pussies, which very low in my mind, and the content was pretty repetitive.
You could expect the same things in each scene, mainly toys and almost always solo. I think I seen a few girl/girl scenes sprinkled in, but not many. The pussy classification wasn't
focused on enough either, for example, a girl with slightly large inner labia qualified as XXXL lips. Come on... I expect a little more from a site that's built on pussy classification! All in
all though, the quality of the content was so good and the close-ups were fantastic too, leading me to recommend this site to someone who like mainly solo action and
close-ups, and if they happen to like girls from around the world, well it's an added bonus.
Details:
I had been surfing around the net one day and seen this site, never really pursued it, but when approached, I took the chance to review it. After all, I LOVE pussy, and "the only pussy classification"
site should be right up my alley!
Inside the login page, I noticed the site isn't overly flashy or exceptionally laid out, but it's done just right. You're presented with some metrics: The site currently boast of 506 models, 639 scenes, 621 videos (179+ hrs!) and almost 40,000 pictures! WOW! Past that, you are given a straightforward menu with links to models, updates and various other pretty standard things, but the one thing I took exception to was the "Requests". Which was a place for the members can request specific fantasies/things you want to see. Looking at the recent ones, the fulfillment of these requests aren't marked anywhere I can see, so it's hard to know if they really got fulfilled. On the request page they list off some from various dates that were fulfilled but they change on refresh so it's hard to tell exactly which ones were requests and which ones were not.
Moving on, you are presented with a couple of other sites (www.weliketosuck.com and www.wetandpissy.com) that you get with the membership to wetandpuffy, then you are given the keys to some pretty nice HD content. The site seems to be updated on no particular cadence, with video updates at the top of the page, and just under those, the picture set updates, followed by the upcoming sets.
Each model had her own page, which linked to all her sets, both images and videos. Diving in to what interested me the most, I started on the videos. I didn't go back and check very update but the ones I did check, were offered up in 4 formats: FLV, MP4, WMV and MP4-HQ . Of course being a HD whore, I focused in on the HQ options, and I was very pleased. They were 1080x1920, with bitrates that bounced around between 5,000kbps and 8,000kbps, but even the lower ones looked good too. The videos were right up my alley too, lots of very tight close-ups, wet looking (lube) action, sexy chicks and gaping holes! I was slightly let down there was only solo action, but like I said, I was pretty happy. The video quality was very nice, making those close-ups fan-fucking-tastic! Although I didn't always agree with the tags they has applied to the girls.
Over on the images side, those were well represented as well, offering two sizes: 2800x1867 and 1024x769 for the newer sets, and lower resolutions for the older sets, but they still looked nice. Regardless of the page, the two sizes offered on the page were browse-able and downloadable (ZIP) formats. They were every bit as high quality as the videos were, with great close-ups.
Likes:
Image quality - both video and images.
Can leave feedback on sets.
Lots of good close-ups.
Lots of content.
Lots of different girls.
Access to sister sites.
Dislikes:
The tagging of the videos; too inconsistent.
Frequency of updates - they are inconsistent. Ranging from 2 days to 5+.
Search is a little thin, but this tied to the tags, which I didn't like.
No update schedule (they had some upcoming sets images, but no time table).
Repetitive content.
Site technical details:
Site started: January 2009 (based on the webmaster)
Download speeds: 900+KB/sec
HD Videos: 920x1080 with the bitrates at 8000+
Inside the login page, I noticed the site isn't overly flashy or exceptionally laid out, but it's done just right. You're presented with some metrics: The site currently boast of 506 models, 639 scenes, 621 videos (179+ hrs!) and almost 40,000 pictures! WOW! Past that, you are given a straightforward menu with links to models, updates and various other pretty standard things, but the one thing I took exception to was the "Requests". Which was a place for the members can request specific fantasies/things you want to see. Looking at the recent ones, the fulfillment of these requests aren't marked anywhere I can see, so it's hard to know if they really got fulfilled. On the request page they list off some from various dates that were fulfilled but they change on refresh so it's hard to tell exactly which ones were requests and which ones were not.
Moving on, you are presented with a couple of other sites (www.weliketosuck.com and www.wetandpissy.com) that you get with the membership to wetandpuffy, then you are given the keys to some pretty nice HD content. The site seems to be updated on no particular cadence, with video updates at the top of the page, and just under those, the picture set updates, followed by the upcoming sets.
Each model had her own page, which linked to all her sets, both images and videos. Diving in to what interested me the most, I started on the videos. I didn't go back and check very update but the ones I did check, were offered up in 4 formats: FLV, MP4, WMV and MP4-HQ . Of course being a HD whore, I focused in on the HQ options, and I was very pleased. They were 1080x1920, with bitrates that bounced around between 5,000kbps and 8,000kbps, but even the lower ones looked good too. The videos were right up my alley too, lots of very tight close-ups, wet looking (lube) action, sexy chicks and gaping holes! I was slightly let down there was only solo action, but like I said, I was pretty happy. The video quality was very nice, making those close-ups fan-fucking-tastic! Although I didn't always agree with the tags they has applied to the girls.
Over on the images side, those were well represented as well, offering two sizes: 2800x1867 and 1024x769 for the newer sets, and lower resolutions for the older sets, but they still looked nice. Regardless of the page, the two sizes offered on the page were browse-able and downloadable (ZIP) formats. They were every bit as high quality as the videos were, with great close-ups.
Likes:
Image quality - both video and images.
Can leave feedback on sets.
Lots of good close-ups.
Lots of content.
Lots of different girls.
Access to sister sites.
Dislikes:
The tagging of the videos; too inconsistent.
Frequency of updates - they are inconsistent. Ranging from 2 days to 5+.
Search is a little thin, but this tied to the tags, which I didn't like.
No update schedule (they had some upcoming sets images, but no time table).
Repetitive content.
Site technical details:
Site started: January 2009 (based on the webmaster)
Download speeds: 900+KB/sec
HD Videos: 920x1080 with the bitrates at 8000+
Please consider supporting the site by clicking our partner banners.
If you don't see them, you may have an ad-blocker
