Please consider supporting the site by clicking our partner banners.
If you don't see them, you may have an ad-blocker
Summary:
When I first seen the site I was thinking girls jerking guys off, but nope, it was girls "yanking" themselves - even better! And it's not typical solo porn, its porn that truly focuses on the
girl while she's having an orgasm - well most of the time, sometimes there's interviews and some lesbian action.😉 And the topper is it's all done with women behind the camera, and I couldn't
think of a better way to have it. There was a lot of upside to this side, authentic orgasm, girls that aren't wearing lots of make-up and girls of all walks of life, to name a few. I had a
love/hate relationship with the camerawork. At times we would get no close-ups, and I like the full body shots, but I love watching a contracting pussy from an orgasm. I also love looking to
see how wet the girls get - another thing I find VERY sexy - but it's hard (if not impossible) to do from afar. The biggest downside I had was tagging. They didn't seem to be consistent which
what I was looking for, but this wasn't a major negative for me. This is the site for those looking to see real female orgasms. It's loaded with all "makes and models" of girls, all showing
off how they cum. So, as someone who really enjoys seeing girls authentically having an orgasm (I think it's one of the hottest and sexiest things on earth), I would certainly recommend this
to someone else that into it. Anyone looking for fucking, look elsewhere, as it's not here outside some sporadic lesbian action.
Details:
Getting inside the site, the first thing I noticed was the discrepancy between what the public pages showed and what the actual members section looked like. The public pages were much more modern and were just more visual appealing.
I'll be the first to admit, the look of a site shouldn't matter, it should be the content, but I think it needs to be mentioned. With that aside, they get right to the point, the content, filling up the screen with 2 pages
of the latest updates, the most popular girls and a "cumming soon" section. The updates are a mixture of videos and pictures, and it seemed there were updates daily, ranging from 1 to 2 updates a day.
You could separate the content like most sites, by videos, by pictures, along with seeing their bios and a list of models. All of them were sortable by the most recent, most popular and by name/title. The videos were the core of the site, at least in my eyes, offering up the largest quantity of content (2000+) going back so the early 2000s. Each scene, or movie, was downloadable with newer ones offered up in 1080, 720 and 408 MP4 file format, along with a WMV format as well. Also, each one was streamable too, in the same formats offered up for download. Each scene was rated and gave you the ability to add it to you favorites, as well as allowed you to look at a gallery of screen captures from the video. Unfortunately the captures weren't zipped so you could get them all in one pass. Moreover, there were tags and suggested sites to help you find more scenes like the one you are on. I found the tags slightly helpful only because they didn't always represent the content of the movie. For example I love seeing pussies get wet, so I found the "Wet" tag. After checking a couple of videos, I didn't see the wetness I was looking for and would have expected considering the site is focused on female masturbation.
Likes:
Real female orgasms!
High definition videos.
Unlimited downloads.
Daily updates - but this is barely a like, since some of the updates are "light" on the content side.
Can comment and rate videos.
Very natural girls (they aren't made up like "pornstars").
Had a transgender (woman to man), and a deaf girl! It may sound bad to point these out, but it's impressive to me that they had such unconventional things.
Dislikes:
Dated look and feel in the members area.
Short videos.
Improperly tagged videos.
You could separate the content like most sites, by videos, by pictures, along with seeing their bios and a list of models. All of them were sortable by the most recent, most popular and by name/title. The videos were the core of the site, at least in my eyes, offering up the largest quantity of content (2000+) going back so the early 2000s. Each scene, or movie, was downloadable with newer ones offered up in 1080, 720 and 408 MP4 file format, along with a WMV format as well. Also, each one was streamable too, in the same formats offered up for download. Each scene was rated and gave you the ability to add it to you favorites, as well as allowed you to look at a gallery of screen captures from the video. Unfortunately the captures weren't zipped so you could get them all in one pass. Moreover, there were tags and suggested sites to help you find more scenes like the one you are on. I found the tags slightly helpful only because they didn't always represent the content of the movie. For example I love seeing pussies get wet, so I found the "Wet" tag. After checking a couple of videos, I didn't see the wetness I was looking for and would have expected considering the site is focused on female masturbation.
Likes:
Real female orgasms!
High definition videos.
Unlimited downloads.
Daily updates - but this is barely a like, since some of the updates are "light" on the content side.
Can comment and rate videos.
Very natural girls (they aren't made up like "pornstars").
Had a transgender (woman to man), and a deaf girl! It may sound bad to point these out, but it's impressive to me that they had such unconventional things.
Dislikes:
Dated look and feel in the members area.
Short videos.
Improperly tagged videos.
Please consider supporting the site by clicking our partner banners.
If you don't see them, you may have an ad-blocker
